Sticking a fork in “man-on-the-street” interviews

In my reporting career, I was blessed that I didn’t have to do too many “man-on-the-street” interviews. (Sorry, but “person on the street” has never taken off.) Oh, I did my share of Black Friday shopping stories and Christmas Eve shopping stories and “who-are-you-voting-for” stories, but I wouldn’t consider them a staple of my reporting diet. I always had an assigned beat so I could usually come up with something better to do.

Besides, I despised the things. They’re so fake. Tell people you’re working on a story about X and you want their opinion on it. The result is that you write a story quoting five or six people, usually trying to represent “both sides.” Does the reader learn anything? No.

I’m embarrassed to say that in my early days asĀ an editor, I assigned man-on-the-street interviews. The paper had to be filled, after all. But once I became the editor of the paper, I not only didn’t assign such a vacuous story — I had other vacuous stories to assign — but I discouraged other editors from doing them.

The best example of why appeared on Jimmy Kimmel last night.

YouTube Preview Image

(H/t Suzanne Tobias)



2 thoughts on “Sticking a fork in “man-on-the-street” interviews

  1. Did you see/hear the Howard Stern Interviews? They were far better. Romney being black, McCain running again, Palin running again, Romney as Obama’s VP.

Comments are closed.